Home › Compare › Ashby vs Greenhouse
Head-to-head · 2026Ashby vs Greenhouse: which should you buy?
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | ★★★★½ 4.7 | ★★★★½ 4.5 |
| Category | Applicant tracking | Applicant tracking |
| Price tier | $$ · $100–$1,000/mo | $$$ · $1,000–$5,000/mo |
| Trial | Demo only | Demo only |
| Ideal team size | 20–2,000 employees | 100–10,000 employees |
| Reporting | Native dashboards, custom reports without BI | Standard reports; BI connector for custom |
| Scheduling | Included | Basic; most teams add GoodTime |
| Integrations | Growing marketplace | 500+, the largest |
| Starting price | Low hundreds per month | Four figures per month, annual |
| Best for | Scaling startups and tech mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise structured hiring |
Ashby in brief
Ashby is the recruitment tool we would buy first if we were starting a 50-person company today: an applicant tracking system, scheduling, and real reporting in one product, priced for teams that have not yet earned a RevOps analyst.
Greenhouse in brief
Greenhouse remains the default ATS for companies that want structured, repeatable interviewing and are willing to pay for the largest integration ecosystem in recruiting.
FAQ
Is Ashby or Greenhouse better?
Ashby wins for companies under 2,000 employees on reporting, included scheduling and price; Greenhouse wins on ecosystem breadth and for enterprises with complex compliance needs.
Who should choose Greenhouse over Ashby?
Greenhouse is the better choice for mid-market structured hiring; Ashby is best for scaling startups.
Which is cheaper, Ashby or Greenhouse?
Ashby is in our $$ tier ($100–$1,000/mo); Greenhouse is in the $$$ tier ($1,000–$5,000/mo).
Full Ashby review · Full Greenhouse review · All comparisons